What?
What as Mitchel's book to do with anything here - another straw man to avoid the real questions.
You make outrageous claims, such as your latest attempts to blame land agents for the evictions, then do a runner when they are challenged with facts.
You now are attempting to create a diversion with a book nobody has cited and has nothing to do with the arguments here I extend the same invitation I have to Keith - answer the points.
Mitchel's book (whichever that is) is certainly not the basis of criticism of British culpability - actual British policy is.
You have avoided every item of that that has been put up, and no doubt will continue to do so.
Please give us the benefit of your wisdom and stop waffling
Jim Carroll