Keith..

Can you read?

A ten second trawl finds in the discussion of HIV transmission the following;

Posted 1 April.   "Male homosexuals (MSM) are defined by who they like to have sex with, NOT by who they love."

In the same post, we see;

"Heterosexual marriage is an excellent template for society, but the prevalence of "open relationships" amongst the male homosexual community is extremely risky and unhealthy in today's sexual climate."

(Notwithstanding the worm's mixing of MSM with homosexual, which is like saying a girl enjoys a good fuck even if she claims to be a virgin.)

That's just one found within a minute of trying.

Tell you what, hang on, let's scroll down a couple of posts shall we?

30 March. "Many male homosexual relationships, unions and "marriages" are "open" by common consent."   Then we get "As such, they are radically different from conventional heterosexual marriages which are for the large part monogamous.. And next paragraph, "The studies also suggest that these "open" relationships which include multiple sexual partners are an additional risk in HIV transmission."   

By the way, there are thousands of rapists in prison and many more not caught yet. It must be very widely believed that the law is wrong, eh Keith?