"We now know that it is not scientifically accurate to refer to a "gay gene" as the causative agent in homosexuality. The available evidence clearly establishes that no such gene has been identified.".... (Goofus)

YEAH?............AND?

Like to explain how that comment has any relevance to the argument?

NO?

Well, my incoherent friend, you forget just one important point. The fact that such a gene hasn't been discovered YET, doesn't mean it won't be discovered tomorrow or next year.

In 1900 you wouldn't have found many who believed men would ever fly, and predicting spaceflight would have earned you a season ticket to the "Funny Farm".

So your certainty is at best misguided, and any conclusions derived from it are frankly nonsense. Do you have any idea how large the human genome is, and how complex?