OK..I humored you....NOTE the CAPS!!!

http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/news/20050128/is-there-gay-gene

"Researchers say it's the first time the entire human genetic makeup has been scanned in search of POSSIBLE genetic determinants of male sexual orientation. The results SUGGESTS that several genetic regions MAY influence homosexuality."
(Gosh, if it was all 'mapped out' you'd think someone would shout out 'Eureka!'....but they didn't...'POSSIBLE SUGGESTIONS that MAY..'...sounds more like speculative guessing, to me!..read it again).


http://www.livescience.com/7056-mom-genetics-produce-gay-sons.html

"Maybe everyone could use a gay uncle."(sounds already biased)

"A new study found that homosexual men MAY be predisposed to nurture their nieces and nephews as a way of helping to ensure their own genes get passed down to the next generation.
Research has confirmed that male homosexuality IS AT LEAST PARTLY hereditary – it TENDS to cluster in families,"
(This one starts off being silly!).


http://vigilance.teachthefacts.org/2006/02/gay-chromosome.html

"It wouldn't be right if we didn't mention this new research supporting the HYPOTHESES that sexual orientation has got a genetic component.
New research adds a TWIST to the debate on the origins of sexual orientation, SUGGESTING that the genetics of mothers of multiple gay sons act differently than those of other women."
(More suggestions..).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28

"The 1993 study by Hamer examined 114 families of gay men in the United States and found increased rates of homosexuality among maternal uncles and cousins, but not among paternal relatives. This pattern of inheritance SUGGESTED that THERE MIGHT be linked genes on the x-chromosome, since males always inherit their copy of the x-chromosome from their mothers."
(SUGGESTED that there MIGHT????.....sounds pretty tentative, at best)

Don to himself: "Now go away and play with yourself and stop bothering the adults!"

A lot of 'MIGHTS' and 'MAYBES' and 'SUGGESTIONS'....Do you consider 'MIGHTS' and 'MAYBES' and 'SUGGESTIONS' to be definitive or conclusive????????

No wonder you guys live in a delusional fantasy world!

Give us a FACT, for a change!..ummm....like 'The gene is__________'(such and such, with the definitive number)....but there isn't one...

...only 'MIGHTS' and 'MAYBES' and 'SUGGESTIONS'!!!...(but maybe even an occasional 'seems to indicate'...SUGGESTING that they MIGHT be onto something that MAY lead to another SUGGESTION of an indication...which to you dunderheads turns it into a politicized 'fact', I MAY SUGGEST...that is, from all indications....)

GfS

OK..You can go back to your bullshitting!