You stated, "It was rejected by BMJ on two counts. Failure to declare anti gay political donations by two of the authors and making unsubstantiated conclusions from the evidence. "

The truth is you do not even know if it was submitted to BMJ.
How could you?
If it was, you do not know why it was rejected.
How could you?
You do not know what donations any of the authors may or may not have received.
How could you?

If you did not make it all up, where did it come from?
That is all I have been asking you.
Why does that make you so abusive?