"American Christians who murder doctors and nurses involved in termination of pregnancy", Ian, do not do so by judicial process in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction within which they do it. Stop being so stupid as to pretend you can't see the distinction, you fatuous ostrich, you!

My comment as to what I knew boobies like you would say points to the opposite of misgivings; ie that I know I am right whatever foolish people like you might feel PC-ly obliged to rejoin. You really are doing yourself little credit by being unable to muster any better argument.

In particular, you have dodged my explicit questions, to which a direct answer would be welcome, as distinct from irrelevancies about the Islamic denizens of our own population, who are entirely marginal to my interrogatives..

To remind you, here they are again:-
I ask yet again if anyone can point to any other contemporary faith which induces so perverse a concept of "honour" in any of its adherents, or whose followers, in so many jurisdictions where they have gained power, use its tenets to justify such excesses of governmental forensic "justice".

Telling me that Muslims who live here may not agree with such procedures is no sort of answer to the questions whatsoever. It is the extrapolations, and claims of divine authority [see the article linked by Bobad in his last post] from the citable teachings of the faith which induce such responses, which are of concern. Even if they are not accurately invoked [see point above about their being Hadithic if not perhaps directly Koranic], it is obviously regarded by the authorities where such abuses obtain as more than their jobs or safety are worth to attempt to intervene. Do you really think the "American Christians" you cite operate in conditions of such confidence & certitude?

~M~