"But this thread is about Islamic radicalism, not national law"
.,,.

'Yes yes yes' right back 2U! -- Why "But"? The two concepts are interdependent, not [as 'but' implies] incompatible, within the terms of reference of this colloquy. It is the radicalism which incites, & is held to justify, the [IMO misplaced] laws, surely? So 'national law' is part of, & an outcome of, the "radicalism" which, as you rightly say, is what this thread is about, rather than tangential or non-germane, as your 'but' implies.

So answer my questions, please, & stop trying to justify avoidance of doing so by recourse to factitious would-be diversional irrelevancies.

~M~