Hamad with his inside knowledge, The New Statesman and the Guardian say it is impartial.
How does Musket answer all that testimony?
He says they are "toadies."

As ever, his one and only debating tactic and argument is name calling!
Not really a winner Musket.

Now let us look at all the evidence Musket has put up in defence of his views.
Errrr, nothing.
Zilch.
They are all toadies, and that is it.

I think the "discussion" is over and was a little one-sided.
Time to move on.