Or..

How can anyone know more than teachers of any particular school under scrutiny?

Except the OFSTED inspectors bring outside objectivity. Having been involved in regulation myself for a few years, I see that experience and affinity bring a dimension to a debate, not an answer. An answer includes cold objective scrutiny. That's why the victims don't get to sit on the jury or bench.

Michael's linking all Muslims with radical fanatics is as piss poor as the mindset that linked all European Jews with the haves v have nots debate that was popular in the '20s and '30s. I've seen photos of the blackshirts marching, so my recollection is at least as good.

If the time of the blackshirts marching is relevant, then discuss the difference between young British men going to Syria to defend an ideal and young British men going to Spain. Both advised otherwise by the government of the day, both going for the same perceived purpose.

Keith as ever sees items he agrees with as stronger in evidence base than anything that offends his stupidity.

Well done.