Whilst religious leaders line up to defend the past, The Dept of Health in The UK is agonising over whether to give "dead person" status to aborted foetus parts.

It puts it in perspective. This thread is about real people up to nine years old and at the same time, the medical world is discussing what was previously regarded as pathology waste in its other status as a life that wasn't.

I find it difficult to reconcile the two moral approaches. I am involved in the latter and am helping with the guidelines. Whilst working on it this afternoon, (including watching a documentary from the other month) I wondered how our ethics dilemma would approach the practice of throwing babies and children you had starved into a cesspit.

The more I think, the more I condemn the actions of these wicked animals. Anybody who seeks to "put it in perspective" or "not judge the actions of recent memory" may wish to think on the enormity of the mass grave and crimes against humanity. Whilst those who find parallels with the foetal remains debate possibly have the excuse of not understanding what they read.