In the Keith A of Hertford Vs Musket discussion, it is good to see them agreeing that religion should have nothing to do with it. I'm siding with Musket however is saying that religion has much to answer to in promoting and expecting adherence to repressive ancient thinking that leads to children growing up with an outlook that is contrary to the freedoms of movement and oppression society in general enjoys.

Religion is fine if a person willingly accept to be bound by a moral guide of their own accord, but children of Muslims in madrasses, children of catholics wearing wedding dresses in rituals and children of many religious parents having their genitals mutilated? Child abuse.

A court tells young men that their grooming was wrong, but an Imam and an ignorant father has been telling them otherwise for years; which should the poor buggers listen to?