The prosecution lawyer was unbelievably nasty and deeply vitriolic towards Rolf Harris, especially over the Cambridge incident, which was NOT as she claimed it to be at all, please read my remarks about Sue Cook, above. However, she was also very clever. I also felt the judge was biased too. He should have stopped her at times, although she was using the oldest trick in the book, for once such words are out of a lawyer's mouth, that's it, they have reached the ears of the jury, regardless of what the judge says. However, he appeared to say nothing at all, as nothing was reported.

I post under my name as 'Guest', in the same way every time. I no longer want to be a full time member of Mudcat, nor have anyone send me messages here, as I've had some very unpleasant messages in the past and have NO wish to have that repeated. If someone wants to say something about me then put it where everyone can see it.

I'm just off to write to the Attorney General too, to tell him what I think of the sentence. Thanks for that information, Eliza.


My comment about 'guests' was 'anonymous' guests, or those who use a name for a thread, merely to abuse someone else. They should be named and shamed. It's always caused chaos and upset on here.