So, Lizzie, you've gone on and on and on at great length about this case, giving your opinions ad nauseum. And, yeeesss, you are entitled to your opinion - before you start on that old chestnut. But you do know, don't you, that, without any evidence, your opinion is worthless? And if you have got any evidence pertinent to this case, why didn't you present it to the appropriate authorities at the appropriate time?

You remind me of all of those climate change deniers. They've got lots and lots of 'selective received wisdom' to support their preferred conclusion (that climate change isn't happening) but they've got no real hard evidence to support their cases. Thus, their opinions are worthless and they're NOT entitled to equal 'air-time' with real climate scientists.