"Maybe Lizzie or someone else can enlighten me. Hopefully with facts rather than feelings!"

As I wrote above, if Lizzie was in possession of genuine evidence related to the Rolf Harris case she should have reported it to the appropriate authorities at an appropriate time. But, although I haven't ploughed through all of her 'contibutions' (I do have a life after all!) I would be prepared to bet that she has never been in possession of any such evidence. What she continues to re-gurgitate, over and over again, is her interpretation of case related material that she has read in the media. And her interpretation of that material is, of course, strongly biased towards the premise that 'Rolf is innocent'!

What puzzles me is why does she keep telling us? Why isn't she starting a 'Free Rolf Harris!' campaign? Best of luck with that, Lizzie!