I have no problem with anyone having a different opinion, Lizzie. I just want to know how you think that the two cases are so different. You are as fully convinced that Savile is guilty as you are that Harris is innocent. The only evidence against both is what the accusers have said. Do you have some knowledge or insight not available to th erest of us? To make a case proof is required and, as yet, you have not furnished any.

One should never make one's mind up over a matter before being absolutely certain of the facts

DtG