There are certain individuals whose views I find absolutely repugnant, but who wipe the floor with their regular opponents because those opponents choose to insult the person rather than challenging his arguments.

Do you really believe that, Backwoodsman?

Because someone says please and thank you they are better people? Sorry, but I just cannot understand that. What about content? If a repugnant view is packaged in flowery language is it any less repugnant? I think not. You seem to be suggesting that as long as the argument stays within within what is deemed to be acceptable behaviour, it is an acceptable argument. Is that right?

I don't often use bad language or insults but sometimes I feel it is the only response. Sometimes I get frustrated and just use it in anger. Wrong, I know, but even if my moniker says otherwise, I am only human. Anyhow, I believe that it is a far better person that opposes bigotry, in whatever language, than one who is a bigot but polite.

And Lizzie, this thread is not about you or Rolf Harris. Try opening your own thread.

Cheers

DtG