what do you mean, and could you give some examples of serious error, bill, so I know what you are referring to.
well bill, I prefer my experts and you prefer yours, it is the validity of the claims that matter, and I,m sure you would agree that it is a fallacy to say that a truth claim is verified by having more supporters. science has often advanced because someone questioned the status quo.
and I am sorry but I really do not remember how you accounted for soft tissue in dinos, other than saying you did not know it could last that long till it was found in dino bone. I do remember, as reported in CMI that there is an experiment with iron and ostrich bones, but who is going to check that in hundreds, let alone millions of years. prior to the discovery of soft tissue in those bones there was no thought of it lasting that long....quite the opposite , I reckon. dino DNA [ WHICH YOU BOUGHT UP] has not many reports yet so I guess the deep time story does not have to be adjusted just yet.