"So , how do evolutionists account for soft tissue in dino bone?"


Read this, Pete... it took me all of 45 seconds to find.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/


and another one. But the first goes into the detail about what was happening... both in research and in deciding what COULD be possible.

It seems no one had ever seen such results because they couldn't imagine LOOKING for something that was 'impossible'. It was when they were confronted with bewildering evidence that they had to do what science is supposed to do- look carefully at results and revise their thinking in order to account for that evidence.
They could have mumbled something about "possible contamination" and "flawed tests" and continued to **believe** that such things were impossible.... but other scientific tests said that no matter what had been **believed**, they were seeing collagen that had been preserved. Now they needed to find a SCIENTIFIC explanation for data that kept refusing to be denied. They did find answers... it is Creationists that continue to **believe** that there must be some mistake, because this old manuscript from 2000 years ago listed some people & ages and when added up, seemed to limit 'creation' to 6000 years ago.

**Belief** can hamper understanding in science OR religion, but science has a built-in self-correcting mechanism, if used properly.