"...but seems to me that your post is spin, and the efforts of the authors of the links, damage control and spin..."

The point of my post is that it was NOT 'spin'... that they were forced to integrate the new data with all other known data in order to make sense out of it. They have no religious or moral need to discover a pre-determined set of answers... they simply do not. And if new evidence appears to force a re-evaluation of THIS finding, it will be part of a newer set of answers.

YOU have trapped yourself into a never ending 'damage control' based on far less. It is YOU who believes something that cannot be ever proven, and YOU discredit science in general because it doesn't always support YOUR simplistic, narrow belief system.

There is little more I can say....