Again, Keith: without meaning to be patronising, I wonder why you bother. I said it once about Jim. The more so with the noxious, ill-motivated, spiteful, & altogether malignant & malevolent Ian, whose posts I now almost always scroll thru without even reading, because I just don't feel obligated to have my ulcer-pains revived by his incessant point-missing vindictiveness & malice & spleen. Every now & then for once in a way I read one, and even reply; & he smarmily welcomes me back with "It's good to talk". Not with him, it isn't; not in my book.

≈M≈