" it has been estimated that all the requisite passengers needed to repopulate after the flood,..."

Would that include invertebrates - beetles, butterflies and moths, bugs, flies, bees and wasps, spiders, slugs and snails etc., etc., etc., pete?
And what about plants? Would there have been enough room for redwoods and oaks and birches and maples as well as ferns, mosses, primroses, saxifrages, tulips, narcissi, daisies, buttercups, irises, forget-me-nots, orchids etc., etc., etc.?

"my information is that there would be diverse genetic information ..."

And what would be the source of that information, pete?
'redneckcreation.com' by any chance?

"the discovery of stuff that should not have survived[ found in dino bone]is evidence that the dinos could not possibly be as old as alleged ..."

Yes, I dimly remember some of that stuff from previous threads. But when a scientist finds an (alleged in this case) anomaly she/he doesn't immediately throw up her/his hands and shout: "Oh no! The whole of modern science must be wrong and the Bible must be right!" That's illogical and stupid (but par for the course for creationists, I suppose).