I see that, yet again, you've avoided answering the points that I've made, pete.

Is it because I called you a "stupid, ignorant fundamentalist twat"? Well, there's no getting away from it, you are! Here's what reduced me to 'calling-a-spade-a-spade':

"when you can demonstrate what your idea of scientific reality is I may be able to give another answer. in the mean time you have just conceded that your learning has no bearing on evolutionary belief,..."

In that 'chunk of words' that passes for a sentence, you casually dismissed, belittled and mocked the learning that I have gained in my lifetime and the things that I have achieved in that lifetime. I do not have to 'demonstrate' anything to you! How about you 'demonstrating' something for a change - something other than appeals to the dubious authority of the Bible and stuff you've re-gurgitated from creationist websites. YOU have conceded that you've got no scientific "learning" or background so it's your conclusions and statements which can legitimately be called into question.