I don't perceive his posts as you do, Ian. I have several times explained why, and do not propose to seek it all out to refresh &c.

I have explicitly declared myself neutral as to the content of his assertions, but deplore your efforts to silence him on matters which I can in no way perceive him at fault for urging. The legislation you refer to was not intended to stifle reasonably expressed rational debate, which is what you seem to me to be trying to do, with your blusterings about criminal behaviour which you propose to bring to the attention of the competent authorities, & all that sort of vainglorious bullfrogging.

It is clearly a matter on which our mileages vary, as the phrase has it.

≈M≈