I was suggesting that homosexual "marriage" was likely to make society "worse", as I happen to think that retaining the traditional definition is of the utmost importance if the institution is to continue.

Ake, it's time to get off of this theme you keep harping on. Expanding access to legally protected and sanctioned monogamous relationships to the LBGT community can only strengthen society. Your continued "disease" red herring has absolutely nothing to do with civil or religiously sanctioned marriage. Absolutely. Nothing. You are worried about a promiscuous lifestyle in the human population and perceive a health risk. Fine. Stop at that point and recognize that letting partners commit to each other and build from there is a good thing.

GtS came up with this whopper No need to argue with me...check your history.

Sorry, Bucko, but you can't win an argument with a global unsubstantiated remark that requires absolutely no work on your part, only on the part of whoever you are challenging. "I'm right, live with it" says the same thing - and is equally wrong.

Let's put some faces on this discussion:

Seattle marriages on first day of marriage equality.

New York marriages on first day of marriage equality.

An apology that spoke for many.

SRS