I like your contributions, nearly without exception, especially those about copyright (due to a lack of knowledge I do not contribute, but I read). And I also like Richard's contributions, again nearly without exception.
Now don't tell me you have not seen what Richard has meant in his last post. It was this sentence from you (sorry if I'm wrong): If the first sale doctrine is not universal, then it's high time it became so. The meaning of this sentence is defendable and cannot cause irritation in my eyes, but the wording is slightly chauvinistic.