Todman Oh What a Lovely War - already mentionednot disputed,
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/he-had-hatred-thrust-upon-him/99766.article
Already mentioned - DeGroot the militarist - one maningless line
"This quote,"
Fuck your quotes - you claim to have linked them - you lied
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25776836
Amorphous argument dealing largely with the appalling conditions men were forced to endure - does not deal with anything being discussed, in no way confirms anything to have argued
"http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2535004/Baldrick-Lefts-cunning-plan-twist-history-fit-deadly-delusions.html#ixzz3KDCCxbrX"
Unopenable link to Daily Mail
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n23/margaret-macmillan/von-hotzendorffs-desire
Uncredited book review - are you saying the reviewer is a historian
Interesting though - the blog at the bottom reads
"Before 1914, starting a war was neither a crime in international law nor a sin against morality, and there was no principle that said that a country which started a war had to make amends afterwards. Both these ideas were retroactively introduced in the Treaty of Versailles. It doesn't matter whether Germany started the war or German policy caused it, both of which are beyond dispute: at issue is the word 'guilt' itself – a point which Margaret MacMillan seems to have missed (LRB, 2 December).
Oliver Pretzel"
"http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26048324 "
Article on who started the war - already mentioned
Is that it for "many, many", "consensus" and "all historians agree with me"
Come onnnnn
A joke's a joke!!
You really are something else.
Wonder if there's anything decent on tele - Morcambe and Wise maybe
Jim Carroll