""you're on the wrong track. ""

I dont see it as so. It seems to me that you are off on somewhat of a different tangent, which is ok with me-as this is a broad topic.

Powerful positions in the world are mostly held by males. I suspect many got to these positions by "whoring" themselves to "someone" along the way. While many ignore thisbwith males, when success is reached- not so for many of the successful women.

Women linked to these powerful people (in one way or another) frequently have opportunities to share in some of the power and fame. Each get something out of such relationships, sometimes merely sex and conquest (take the Kennedy example), other times more than that. How they get to such symbiotic relationships is, IMO, mostly their business-as long as it is legal. But, unfortunately, the good work woman frequently do is frequently downplayed by reference to their use of their sexual attributes. This infrequently happens with males.

As to your earlier post, there is a big difference with what comes before the word whore (for example, political whore), versus if it stands alone.

.As to the rest of your message, where precisely did you ever get such intimate details of their relationship, you refer to as "facts". Sources are often useful when making such claims, so folks can ascertain the liklihood of accuracy.