So, you agree that you claim that all living historians substantiate your claim cannot be proven? Wow! We are making progress. But why should it be up to someone to disprove your claims when you are the one who is making them? You know, I think you would make an excellent religious leader. Ever thought of starting an organisation based on claims that cannot be substantiated and then challenging people who disbelieve them? I think it may have done before but you know how gullible people can be...