You have been claiming that your view is the only one held by modern historians and your entire case is based on that - no other modern historian gives any other opinion on world war one - on that basis, you ahe (extremely stupidly) rejected all dead historian, unbelievable as that may sound!!!
You have either lied or you are extremely stupid (more likely
both - they go together like a horse and carriage)
I gathered these over the space of about ten minutes and have put them up in groups to underline your idiocy.
I offer no opinions on them - I have read them through, but I don't believe cut-'n-pastes sufficient to form an opinion on.
You have been given a tiny portion of the conflicting views held by modern historians contrary to your claim that they are all of one opinion
You claim to have put up positive proof of ypour own claims, which, far from being modern - dte backk to those being claimed in the period between the wars.
Link us to your "proof" or fuck off
Jim Carroll