"So you do not deny that I have provided ample quotes supporting my points"
No I don't - you have provided half a dozen points of view - there are over a hundred historians working on WW1 - you refused even to read the list because it was too long
Your historians amount to half a dozen people who, by their own admission, are seeking to change the popular view of history - which proves nothing.
You don't even accept the statement of one of your own historians on how Haig is regarded by his fellow historians - give us a break!!
Now your consensus
"I have in fact quoted historians saying there is a consensus,"
You keep alluding to this - where the **** are they and how do they measure up to the general opinion?
There really isn't anything more "ridiculous" than alluding to proof you claim to have given, yet refusinng to link to it
Jim Carroll