The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #156088   Message #3686133
Posted By: GUEST
16-Dec-14 - 04:34 AM
Thread Name: WWI, was No-Man's Land
Subject: RE: WWI, was No-Man's Land
What about the one Raggy mentioned, does he support you

Subject: RE: WWI, was No-Man's Land
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 14 Dec 14 - 05:47 PM

That article from "your" historian goes on say:

"Haig should have believed in attrition. That is the tragedy of the British in the First World War. Haig should have opted for attrition in the sense of wearing the enemy down gradually - step by step, stage by stage - and devising a means of doing this without getting his own forces worn down"

"Your" historian names and shames Haig. No-one else.