The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #156088   Message #3686174
Posted By: Keith A of Hertford
16-Dec-14 - 07:35 AM
Thread Name: WWI, was No-Man's Land
Subject: RE: WWI, was No-Man's Land
Guest, Raggytash's Historian, Trevor Wilson, also said "Haig was not the dunderhead, certainly not the intentional butcher, that he's often portrayed as being.

"There's a popular view that Haig really set out to get his troops killed, believing that he would swap one of his men for one of the Germans. There would be a bloodbath on both sides; and because he had rather more men than the Germans, he would, at the end of the day, be left victorious, and the Germans defeated.

"This view of Haig is really quite untrue. Haig, in fact, remained an imaginative commander."

Musket, I am sorry you are unable to understand what an historian is.
You must have understood very little of this whole debate.
I would try to explain it to you, but pork is such hard work.