So, Teribus, when historians come to the same conclusion it is consensus. When two people who disagree with consensus come to the same conclusion it is "same crap pushed out a day earlier by a different blogger then vaguely reworded." I also note you put "the men conscripted in 1916 would not in all probability have been at the front in August 1916". Which just shows that even you have an element of doubt in your encyclopedic knowledge. I know you have already said that you will not respond. No matter. I am just pointing out the bias that you rage about in other people. Pity really. I thought you were different.