No, Keith, "The Guardian" does not support your view. One columnist, not representing the editorial position (if there is one on historians), said that Clark was fraudulent (well, couldn't stand the charlatan meself, either) and that Taylor's book was rather vulgar. Actually, I think the Rolling Stones are rather vulgar but I still approve of them. That does not add up to the Guardian as a whole supporting your position. Porkie after porkie, Keith. Amusing in a pathetic sort of way.