Both historians were contemptuously dismissed.
Not repeating both terms of contempt did not alter anything.
No attempt to deceive.
No dishonesty.
Unlike Musket.

Why do none of you criticise his deliberate attempt to deceive us about the content of the Coast programme.

Jim, there is now a consensus so I do reject those views once held by some but now discredited.
It is not because they are dead or lefty, just proved wrong by more recent work.

You have produced not one current historian who still believes those old myths, and you never will.