Fine, Alan, thanks for the explanation. We both relied on interpreting what was said and it appears I interpreted it incorrectly. Sorry if I misrepresented you but it was an honest mistake. My earlier point still stands. A union of ordinary people against the fat cats, without the false borders devised by them in the first place, is preferable to separate nations fighting each other. I think the 'NATs' (is that the right term) are falling for the smoke and mirrors of Westminster and also find it somewhat disconcerting that the Scots, who, in the main, have always been the allies of the downtrodden, are considering leaving their Southern brothers to their fate rather than helping them to fight the current corrupt administration. Still, as I said earlier, we are all different.