Oh - And if you still feel that Neil Faulkner is a joke and a wacky extremist it may interest you to know that History Today magazine disagree with you. I quote "Matthew Shaw, a curator at the British Library, came in on the conversation and suggested that we carry on the debate at the BL and a date was fixed for January 17th. History Today and the curators at the British Library tweeted the details of the event – there wasn't enough time to print any publicity material – and last night 300 people ( sell-out audience) turned up to listen to Gary Sheffield, along with other historians of the Great War – Annika Mombauer, Dan Todman and Neil Faulkner – discuss its origins, its course and its legacy." If all living historians agree, what is there to debate? Interesting eh?