"That is what the articles you have produced say"
Now there's a step in the right direction - up to now you have said that nothing has been produced - the list of your excuses gets longer and longer.
Les face it - you really are on a loser here.
There is no reason why arms should not have been sold to Assad from Britain - they were being sold to Qaddafi and being supplied to the rebels - business is business after all!!!
Britain has sold arms to states with appalling human rights records, Saudi Arabia, Israeli, Bahrain...... why not Syria, they have done nothing whatever to bring influence on the Assad regime over the decades of human rights abuses, torture and mass murder - Mrs T, in fact, described such behaviour as her idea of democracy.
You want to prove that the sales didn't take place, or that they were only for harmless purposes (like the chemicals for harmless toothpaste!!) - produce your evidence rather than shovelling bullshit.
You have made a total arsehole of yourself with all the different excuses you have given for trading arms to terrorist and murderous states - it happens all te time
On this matter, Britain is no different than China or Russia, except that, in their case, there seems to be some twisted support for Assad and his regime, from Britain's point of view, trading in death is an essential part of the economy
BUSINESS IS BUSINESS
Jim Carroll