Terribulus doesn't understand reality though Allan.
Try not to make the mistake of answering his infernal questions either. He responds with claiming you didn't (on other threads normally) and then he cherry picks what you say to make himself look clever. Snag is, most think he looks like a one legged bloke at an arse kicking contest.
You are right. The agreement for the terms of the referendum set a precedent that could use the Supreme Court to uphold a mandated Scottish government and their right to referendum.
That's why I was concerned that it could lead to neverendum territory.
The historical crap Terribulus is stating is irrelevant and forms no viable precedent should Westminster and Edinburgh have conflicting mandates.
That said. Scotland rejected independence and barring fundamental changes to The UK such as Tory suicidal EU exit, am argument could be made to The Supreme Court that nothing has altered since the last one. SNP look like forming the next Scottish Parish Pump Committee and as we and all their supporters know, they are committed to The EU.