"Can you say that every single historian, even by your exacting standards, agree with your points?"

No, and can you show me anybody apart from you lot who has ever made that claim? I believe the phrase originally used was that there was a "consenus" among historians writing about the First World War in recent times. Now to my understanding of that it qualifies what group of historians we are talking about - (Not every single historian - your invention) - the group we are referring to are/were all historians whose area of specialisation IS the First World War, whereas the historians your "camp" dragged up were not. Historians writing post 1970 on the "Great War" had far, far more detailed information than any who wrote on the subject previously - yet all that has to be discounted and we are all expected to sing from the same hymn sheet based on "Made Up Shit" swallowed "Hook-Line-and-Sinker" by you, the Musktwats, Steve Shaw, Jim Carroll and Raggytash. Got news for you Gnome - it ain't going to happen. You lot keep coming out with your myths, misrepresentations, half-truths and lies and you will be pulled up on them.