well, I just finished watching the rather fishy excuse for evolutionism. tiktaalek [ probably wrong spelling ! } appears to be shubins supposed clincher. he was a bit selective about the data , and omitting qualifiers he himself has admitted elsewhere. I suppose I could elucidate at this point, but I will let you show me what you reckon tikis discovery demonstrates to substantiate the evolutionary story ?!   
what you cannot do, is charge me with evading evolutionary "science".
however, I will put pt 2 on hold till you engage with the supposed evidence of pt 1.
go on, show me some evolution.....credit snail.