Jim, that post is just a long cut and paste of an article first quoted over a year earlier here.
The article where Kinealy states that revisionist historians are dominant and long have been.

On the same day you deny that the revisionist historians I quoted are valid, calling them "historians" in quotes.

12 Mar 14 - 10:18 AM
"I just thought it dishonest to state Britain's culpability as an undisputed fact, knowing that is not the case."
Now you are being maliciously dishonest - you have deliberately refused to respond to the actual statements of Britain's representative in Ireland at the time - instead you have manufactured claims by selected "historians" writing a century and a half later to prove (sic) "Britain never dunnit Guv" (again)