Jim, revisionist historians know everything you know, and yet remain revisionists.
It is an alternative view to yours, it is legitimate, and it is held by many and probably most historians.
Do you deny that fact?

My crime was just putting that alternative view without even endorsing it.
Jim was outraged.
Why?

Here is my first post in full.

"Another historical perpective.
"How culpable were the British ministers of the 1840s? They are charged with having given inadequate, limited relief because of their commitment to a doctrine of laissez faire. However, given the scale of the problem and the acute nature of the crisis once the harvest had failed for a second time in 1846, there was little they could do."
Read more: http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lessons-of-history-the-great-irish-famine#ixzz2Z7fhxnXV
http://www.fee.org/the_freeman/detail/lessons-of-history-the-great-irish-famine#axzz2Z7f2StzS"