Steve, I meant cookies and IP info.
I gather that no-one else thinks there is a risk.
Also they will use hit rate as a measure of support.
I would just prefer to give them a wide birth, but clearly that is just me.

Jim,
it was self identified - stop wriggling,

It was not. There was no way of knowing what you were linking to.

Tou targeted and persistently pursued (claims only of) left entryism into The Labour party and ignored the fact that the Tories were doing it

Not true. I referred to both, and Tories first.
One I was asked for evidence, then more evidence, and one was ignored.

You defended pages and pages of claims from the extremist racist 'Muslim Watch'

That is a lie.
I never defended it or any other site, but I remember the incident.

Someone posted a list of killings that probably came from that site.
Like you I was suspicious of it, although I remembered some of the incidents making the news.

I made a random selection of ones I did not know of and checked them out.
I am sure you did the same.

Neither of us, nor anyone else, was able to find a single false entry.
That was a fact, and stating it is not defending the website.

Once again Jim, you accuse me of all sorts of shit instead of discussing the issues.
You always make it about me.
Please stop.