Dmcg , I doubt joe meant you, and for What it's worth, I consider your posts have been civil and friendly disagreement.   There has been though, it seems to me, misunderstanding about what we thought each other said. Perhaps I was not clear enough in expressing that the things once thought as evidences for evolutionism by its adherents being dropped or discredited, meant not just the initial proposers. A little reflection, however, might have helped though, as for example, I very much doubt that hackle discredited his own fraud !. In theory, there may have been some that published in a journal retracting their former supposed evidence , and if I realised that was what you were asking, I would be, indeed hard pressed to supply what you were asking!       If as you say , you do go no further , fine , and thanks for courteous discourse.