So which page of 'Creation.com' did you parrot all that gibberish from then, Pete? Why not just supply us with the link to the relevant page? When you quote/parrot from this single source, aren't you just appealing to authority - or what you mistakenly believe to be authority?

By the way, what, exactly, is wrong with appealing to authority? What's the alternative?

Are you ever going to move beyond 'Creation.com' and read something written by a real evolutionary biologist?

Oh yes, and weren't you going to show us the "observational, repeatable, testable" ... eerrr ... 'evidences' for the existence of God?