You know I will say that's a false dichotomy, don't you? Anyone who teaches religion like that is a fool. Possibly a well meaning one and possibly there are a look them, but a fool none the less. That is teaching religion as a kind of history rather than about the here and now.

And don't really see much evidence of the second branch either. Titles like "The God Delusion" (which I have read by the way) don't suggest the author is going to be very inclined say believers have much to offer.