You stated, "I still find it objectionable either way and will not bother with it again."

I did indeed Keith, and I still find the inclusion of a christian service in remembrance of non-christian fallen objectionable. I do not and have never found the remembrance objectionable. Which is what you are implying. Why don't you just admit that you misinterpreted my comment? I have no idea if it was accidental or malicious but I shall give you the benefit of the doubt. I will even help you by saying that I could have phrased it better. I don't mind. I have already clarified what I meant but assume you did not read that.