Pete, twice now you've informed us that "evolutionism" is impossible or doesn't exist. For example on 09 Nov 15 at 11.45 AM you wrote:

"This is why I bring up the evidences that evolutionism is impossible, and contrary to observable science."

And on 18 Nov at 05.35 PM you wrote:

" ... we would say there is zero evidence for evolutionism."

So there's no such '-ism' as "evolutionism" is there? So why do you keep using the term?