Part 2, Steve says that YEC ,s benefit from science despite supposedly denying science. Tell me Steve of anything that needed evolutionism(ie the idea of microbes to man etc) to be invented. In fact, science don't need evolutionism at all to function, and made great strides when most scientists were bible believers. Of course , there will often be the expected homage paid to evolution, but it is quite irrelevant to technological advance, so , Steve, that is a fallacious argument of the equivocal variety .       Neither do we deny the scientific method. You cannot do repeatable , observable test on the past....because it been , done and gone , and we were not there. But you say, we have dating methods and creationists don't accept them. Well , as it happens, many time evolutionists don't accept them either, disagree over them, and different methods can give diverse dates.......not to mention when they date for eons old, when a recent date is known.